Ledger Nano X - The secure hardware wallet

See likes

See likes given/taken

Your posts liked by others

Post info No. of Likes
Re: How can I exchange Taucoin to BTC I think P2p groups are everywhere and one just needs to find out where the buyers are.
February 20, 2019, 03:47:42 AM
SPAM Most introductions here are spam and promoting their sites, etc...
February 26, 2019, 06:39:49 AM
Re: "Proof of Transaction" consensus debate - 10 million TAU 12 months
Did Taucoin release their own device that is capable of mobile mining? Or is that a phone with a Taucoin mining app?

At the moment, I'm still not sold to the idea of mobile mining. I have yet to see a device that can handle such activity with all its function as a phone fully working.

it seems that you are quite new here sir. TAUcoin and its Foundation did not release a device for that matter. It is through an app, as they/we are still in the experiment/ beta testing stage. It would be less challenging if people/anyone would be easily sold to the REAL mobile mining. But under TAU's consensus, which is far different and I can say superior to BTC in terms of decentralization, Mobile mining will be possible. After all, POT should not consume too much space unlike POW.

March 28, 2019, 02:42:27 AM
Re: "Proof of Transaction" consensus debate - 10 million TAU 12 months
This idea is quite effective for scaling issue. Also will attract the giant miner to take profit from it. So, it will keep the chain active and speed up the transaction.

 Yes, this is true. but you have to be more careful about fake p2p escrow group. Because this can make number of buyers down.

Also. it is possible to give a exact time frame about the main net. Because i see you are so close to main net launching and very confident about it.


A giant miner will mean that this individual has a LARGE self mining power. Just in case you do not know, mining club has been removed already so combining self power or passing it to one address will not work anymore. 

March 28, 2019, 05:20:40 AM
Re: "Proof of Transaction" consensus debate - 10 million TAU 12 months The tauT move is very smart and I would like to congratulate the Foundation for doing so. Giving the authority to the community is what Satoshi has done, that is what I believe. Upon careful thought of the matters, the community will face something we have never seen before, an automated body govern by us. Such a huge burden I would say. We are re-establishing another community under the same project which Kryptolab above stated should have differences. In light of that, given the new "team" and chairman I suggest to have the following.

1. Body of laws and regulations
    Leaders and members
    Time frame/duration
    Next projec/s
2. Same mods/admins ?
3. Same devs ?
4. same P2P groups?
5. I truly believe the community has more questions in their mind which were not answered in the announcements.

Leaving the project in the community's hands might bring success or failure to the vision. Trust is not the option we ashould have here. Strong leadership and being community-driven is what this project have from the beginning.

April 05, 2019, 05:25:31 AM
Re: "Proof of Transaction" consensus debate - 10 million TAU 12 months
Technology first. POW is a workable consensu, but not the ultimate and the best due to its energy consumption and mining centralization. POT is more decentral and clearn, but under “secrete chain” attack like POS. IPFS can solve this by bring into immutable file and timestamp. First time in the history, by combining POT and IPFS, we could have a real sustainable blockchain. According to IPFS, it is also server-less, since you never know what files stores where. We do need servers for now,  those are  infrastruture for communication. But little by little, it will be replaced by smart phones. We need to work on it step by step.
Removing TAUT from exchange is recommended by ali. I think it is a great decision. Let’s stay low profile, supporting p2p trade and telegram. We need to get technology working first.
The tau mainnet will be 2.1 billion coins. The referral bonus will be higher. We are not clear about taut coins distribution yet. TAUT new site is in DEV. I think we can get an update from there.
I want to reconfirm that we are about technology not price. I will not spend money pump up price, all fiat funds from me is used for technology progressing. All tau coins is for community building. For people love pump and dump coins, there are enough projects out there. Here in TAU, we only do true crypto technology discovery.

Technology cannot be done overnight. Not even in one year. If I were to think properly, TAU tech, together with mobile mining will only be complete in at least 5 years time. Too complicated because we are using new discoveries no one has ever wandered upon yet. For the meantime, the community has nothing to get from acquiring TAUT or TAU today or even in the years to come. There is no usecase yet and I dont think exchanges will come easily. People who have 1M TAUT and more can enjoy their fruitful gathering probably after 3 years, when there'd be a pleasant exchange to follow. P2p now, as we know it, only gives way for people with less TAUT to sell it very cheaply, since, they cannot use it yet in the real world.

probably, if we can continue with TAU-X or Tau monopoly, then we, the community, can somehow have fun usecase for TAU/TAUT aside from buying and selling which proved in the past that even exchanges are not safe. We havent heard anything from TAU-X and Tau monopoly.We should have different devs for that.

In the future, I want to suggest either taut app or TAU app to be used as a wallet, especially for TAU, and not only for mining. If the concept was to have a wallet and a miner, it should function as both. It means we can mine through it, mobile, and we can buy/sell through it as well. Even with scalability issue still at the moment, i think we can still have and use that function to a gradual adoption of the masses. If also necessary, I would suggest to have a local currency converter to TAU app so we can swap it locally without much difference. I would love to see those functions in TAU application. 

May 16, 2019, 11:52:34 PM
Re: "Proof of Transaction" consensus debate - 10 million TAU 12 months Two weeks Im gone and this is what I am reading here. Anyway, congratulations to everyone who made it so far. Your contributions are highly appreciated by the team. And if it isn't obvious to everyone right now, the team is SO FOCUSED with the mobile mining improvement that they neglect and ignore other important factors too saying " TAU network security and stabilization" as priority over other stuff. And what other stuff are we looking for?

1. TAU website update. It looks old and a lot of stuff about TAUT as well, which bRings confusion to many newcomers.
2. TAUT website. Our dear 1st Chairman has a lot of time announcing update about the website. not cool.
3. Advertising. Bounties and ADs are not enough to get more new people. If I were to be honest, there are more spammers here.
4. Mid tier to high tier exchanges for TAUT. yes, this is GoodLife's position but no update in weeks makes it not good.
5. Roadmap update. We'd like to see an " exchange listing" on the roadmap. Dont say it is not priority. Give us a year instead.
6. A section for mobile app version updates information guide.
7. Conrmation and clarification of definition about Jan 1, 2020 taut-tau conversion
8. and much more...

Also I would like to add about the mobile mining app

1. There should be a way that low TAU holder can send tau at a reasonable fee.
2. There should be a limit on how many tx one address can send to his own address.
3. We should remove participant mining when someone sends TAU. It is just like reducing fees. Just reduce the fees. It's not called a reward, it's  a discount.
4. There should be a way for low mining power miners to harvest even a few fee from the block, even not from each block. This mining should be a "low barrier" not the opposite one.
5. Block synch should be "by wallet" and not "by phone". which means that even if I switched phone, as long as I have the wallet address it should be synched properly, especially for a miner wallet.
6. The main problem with TAU mobile mining is that ordinary wallet owners or airdrop participants have no  necessity to use the chain for transacion. There is no usecase for TAU yet. And the fact the we are using POT as consensus mechanism means we have to transact in order to mine or gain mining power. If you are seeing the numbers on the app right now, we are having less and less miners each week due to severe competition and lack of use case. One day, when the top mining power holder does not spam the network any longer , there'd be no longer txs  on the chain thus no more fees to harvest. Instead of spamming the network with self inflicted transactions, Team should make a viable use case for TAU.. payment, games, whatsover as long as it provides valid transaction to be included in the chain.

I believe there are more improVements to be made and we'll soon be seeing it weeks or months later

Again, the team is too focused on the tech and forgets that there are other things to do with the project. Maybe you can get a team to do what you can't do at the  meantime.

June 13, 2019, 02:29:13 PM
Re: "Proof of Transaction" consensus debate - 10 million TAU 12 months It's been a while since we got update from the app. We all thought we're gonna have a weekly update. All of us have been waiting for that great UI design brought out 2 weeks ago.

I just have some questions regarding an attainable speed and security. Isn't there any  layering protocol on which we can integrate as well. Of course sharding is not an option but what about other options? Isnt this a valuable option for high throughput and low latency as well? I think there are some projects with those ideals.

Overall the app still has sync issues and as I can identify clearly, there are still less miners mining. For reasons they dont study the project, we need more information driven activities so as to cultivate their yearning for mobile mining tech.

for now, waiting for IPFS to be installed, if that is what is called..

X2 block size will be on October right? and another x2 on April 2020

July 17, 2019, 02:10:05 AM
Re: "Proof of Transaction" consensus debate - 10 million TAU 12 months Hello iMorpheus. I want to suggest  classifying different types of transaction according to nature and applying it to our consensus. It has come to our senses since the beginning of TAUcoin conception that Proof of Transaction, as it is now, promotes spamming of "useless" and "meaningless" transactions to create/produce mining power. And because of this, new miners are are not encouraged to join in the mining since (1): Participant reward is gone (2): Those who have spammed since the birth of the mobile mining app has "abused" the network thru spammy transactions

The question begs, what kind of transaction is available to the network and the community at this current stage? (a) spam/ meaningless/ useless ( 0.01 TAU sent with 150 TAU as fee ) (b) real transactions/ real transfer, buy and sell transactions, gifting, rewards, referrals and such. And it seems unfair that those "REAL TRANSACTIONS" are overlooked by the network just because these spammers can choose a higher FEE as a normal transaction maker can afford in its entirety.

So, with this information up ahead. I would like to suggest at least 3 kinds of transactions separated accordingly to benefit all miners and transaction makers on the network.

1. Spam transactions - We already know who spams the network. Sending 0.01 TAU or even 1 TAU and using 150 TAU as fee should be considered as a spamming transactions.
2. Referrals/web withdrawals - Giving referrals is the heart of advertisement of TAUcoin. it is the "ONLY" way to generate "new" TAUcoins from the network. It is just right for it to be received immediately especially when transferring to the app wallet.
3. REAL transactions - Already defined above.

These 3 kinds of transactions, but not limited to, can be divided on the block so that priorities can get first. In my opinion, this will be the ranking according to priorities.

Level 1 priority   REAL transactions
Level 2 priority   Web withdrawal/ referrals
Level 3 priority   Spam transactions

There should be a consensus in which the network will agree to divide the block availability on the network in case all three kinds of transactions exist on the pool chain according to the level of priority.

Example: There are 2000 spam transactions, 2000 web withdrawals and 2000 REAL transactions.

The block will be confirming first 50% from the REAL transactions, 30% from the referrals/ web withdrawals and 20% from spam transactions. (Just in case all three kinds of transactions exists at the same time) If there are only  SPAM transactions on the pool, then 100% according to the fees used will be confirmed from those spam transactions.

If in case there are 100 web withdrawals and 100 spam transactions, or any two of different kinds of transactions on the pool at the same time, the network could agree to have a 50/50 from these transactions.

It could look like a miner can have 3 different "mining power" but options can only be for just "ONE" for mining. It  means that you can choose which kind of transactions you would want to mine from the three given examples but not three (3) of them at the same time.

This is very important in so that transaction spammer can benefit from spam transactions and REAL transaction maker can benefit from their real transactions. Web withdrawals/referrals can be mined by REAL transaction makers.

It could divide the miners and invite more to participate.

This is my suggestion. Kindly ignore this if the idea doesn't fit the totality of the POT protocol.

September 10, 2019, 02:22:18 PM
Re: "Proof of Transaction" consensus debate - 10 million TAU 12 months
Yeah!! Sometimes its good to make observations of what others are doing in order to learn, yes I learned a lots from the past discussion, it was sound and productive.

I have few concerns to ask:

1. Before TAU dev erode the code on Java, and now are rewriting it, or I can say they make a transfer from java to GO, for how long will it take to complete the transfer?

2. I think after that you will integrate into IPFS, is GO file system supporting IPFS? If yes then good, if no, do you have another alternative, or you are sire that GO and IPFS will bond correctly?

3. When we started the debate, I remember it was September 2018, it was said, and it is seen from the intro page of this debate, that it will run for one year winder, but we are now beyond 52 weeks which is one year and more already, can it be open and stated till when will this debate run? And if we run this forever, can the team think to reduce the reward? This will also obey to the law of scarcity of which you started with in reducing sign on and refer bonus

Lastly, I would like to congratulate and appreciate the team for great step they made to make real mobile mining happen in real life situation, the existing issues arising I count them as normal due to the tech is still young and need more development and design yo make it less no no bug. Thanks

I totally agree with resetting the rules of this debate if it were to continue. Otherwise, it is just breaking its very own rules. And if I may add, voting results by numbers from the community isn't fair at all. Even those with repetitive debate statements and not-really consensus related issues are being addressed. Sometimes, participants do not even contribute to the debate issues but rather do some "commendation" of the progress of the project and still gets it as participant, sometimes eventually winning #1. If I were to prove one point from voting results from numbers, see our TAUT President voting results as one great example, not that I'm underrating our dear President, but it just shows that numbers don't actually prove itself.

October 10, 2019, 11:56:52 PM