**Great news: TAU main net is on now | Enjoy!**

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10
1
 imorpheus  :) what do you think about e-commerce, and how can it be implemented within the community?
2
maybe in the future I feel that after the implementation of IPFS the problem of unstable fees can be applied, but this does not rule out that there will be people who continue to manipulate fees for their own benefit. And I think this impact might be felt by people who just joined taucoin they might be able to increase their selfpower to at least 1000 but still they will not get anything because people who already have high selfpower will continue to raise their selfpower and will continue to manipulate fee by spamming transactions with high fees and then when there are not too many transactions they will spam with low fees.
3
I think taucoin mining is somewhat unfair because only old people who have joined and have high power can enjoy the results of mining while new people who join taucoin cannot obtain mining results. I think this needs to be reviewed by the developer because only a handful of people can enjoy the results of taucoin mining while others cannot enjoy the results. I am sure there must be a group that is trying to manipulate tx fee to get excess power.
4
Kriptolab - we beginning with combining java with go to avoid too long delay. For example, we will replace cryptographic package with go first, since java is too slow and resource consuming. For IPFS, it has native Go support, so will integrate that. For the android app control components, Java did good job.
I think let’s keep running this debate steady as long as we have coins in foundation. The steadiness of this thread is a good proof of our existence. We will surely move this to blockchain tree.    I guess we will create something like “debate coin” on one of the branch chain.
Trypto - i think once our tau blockchain forum is up, we can redo our policy. I think the branch chain tech will be ready in a few month. So we can restart over there. We can run a real onchain voting using our own technology. I am excited to create that branch as soon as the tree is turned on.
Oniichan- We are internal testing ipfs now, soon will be release first version. For trx speed, the tree blockchain is way faster than anything we have today on a single chain, our block time will be changed to 5 seconds. That will be very fast and good user experiences. With this arrangement, trx fee and expiry time is the only parameters for getting on chain.
Cable- i agree that we have spent so much resource to enable phone, therefore we are potentially having so many miners on the tree. The vision is wonderful, we just need to be steady right now.
5
And lastly, what makes this interesting is that you can mine TAU with your very own smartphone. Mobile mining is accessible the more than half of the world's population. Thus, potential of mass adoption isn't a fantasy but closer to reality.Tau to the moon
6
Yeah!! Sometimes its good to make observations of what others are doing in order to learn, yes I learned a lots from the past discussion, it was sound and productive.

I have few concerns to ask:

1. Before TAU dev erode the code on Java, and now are rewriting it, or I can say they make a transfer from java to GO, for how long will it take to complete the transfer?

2. I think after that you will integrate into IPFS, is GO file system supporting IPFS? If yes then good, if no, do you have another alternative, or you are sire that GO and IPFS will bond correctly?

3. When we started the debate, I remember it was September 2018, it was said, and it is seen from the intro page of this debate, that it will run for one year winder, but we are now beyond 52 weeks which is one year and more already, can it be open and stated till when will this debate run? And if we run this forever, can the team think to reduce the reward? This will also obey to the law of scarcity of which you started with in reducing sign on and refer bonus

Lastly, I would like to congratulate and appreciate the team for great step they made to make real mobile mining happen in real life situation, the existing issues arising I count them as normal due to the tech is still young and need more development and design yo make it less no no bug. Thanks

Your points and advi ce is good buddy,but for the issue of debate let it continue for the last longer because here is the place where we adress the problems about taucoin which we face out there and its a place where we may advice the devlopment team through our beloved C.E.O, and also is the place where we can be answered to our problems directly and well from the C.E.O of this coin.maybe even himself and the time made the rules before that let the debate last last long for one year but due to the facts that are adressed here they convienced president od taucoin to let it continue so that we can adress our problems and fact that will help taucoin to grow well at the future days to come
7
Hello tau team. We are nearing the integration of ipfs and we are all waiting for that. Let's hope to see more miners in the future.

When ipfs will be integrated in the future and block size doubles as well as speed, i want to suggest to change some codes witg regards to transaction priority. I think we should prioritize earlier transactions too. This way, spams and non spam txs will come together and. I dont know if it is really possible to prioritize both high tx fee transactions and earlier transactions but I think it will be a good idea.
I know some coins and DLTs doing this so that they will have faster transaction confirmation time.
8
Yeah!! Sometimes its good to make observations of what others are doing in order to learn, yes I learned a lots from the past discussion, it was sound and productive.

I have few concerns to ask:

1. Before TAU dev erode the code on Java, and now are rewriting it, or I can say they make a transfer from java to GO, for how long will it take to complete the transfer?

2. I think after that you will integrate into IPFS, is GO file system supporting IPFS? If yes then good, if no, do you have another alternative, or you are sire that GO and IPFS will bond correctly?

3. When we started the debate, I remember it was September 2018, it was said, and it is seen from the intro page of this debate, that it will run for one year winder, but we are now beyond 52 weeks which is one year and more already, can it be open and stated till when will this debate run? And if we run this forever, can the team think to reduce the reward? This will also obey to the law of scarcity of which you started with in reducing sign on and refer bonus

Lastly, I would like to congratulate and appreciate the team for great step they made to make real mobile mining happen in real life situation, the existing issues arising I count them as normal due to the tech is still young and need more development and design yo make it less no no bug. Thanks

I totally agree with resetting the rules of this debate if it were to continue. Otherwise, it is just breaking its very own rules. And if I may add, voting results by numbers from the community isn't fair at all. Even those with repetitive debate statements and not-really consensus related issues are being addressed. Sometimes, participants do not even contribute to the debate issues but rather do some "commendation" of the progress of the project and still gets it as participant, sometimes eventually winning #1. If I were to prove one point from voting results from numbers, see our TAUT President voting results as one great example, not that I'm underrating our dear President, but it just shows that numbers don't actually prove itself.
9
 Yeah!! Sometimes its good to make observations of what others are doing in order to learn, yes I learned a lots from the past discussion, it was sound and productive.

I have few concerns to ask:

1. Before TAU dev erode the code on Java, and now are rewriting it, or I can say they make a transfer from java to GO, for how long will it take to complete the transfer?

2. I think after that you will integrate into IPFS, is GO file system supporting IPFS? If yes then good, if no, do you have another alternative, or you are sire that GO and IPFS will bond correctly?

3. When we started the debate, I remember it was September 2018, it was said, and it is seen from the intro page of this debate, that it will run for one year winder, but we are now beyond 52 weeks which is one year and more already, can it be open and stated till when will this debate run? And if we run this forever, can the team think to reduce the reward? This will also obey to the law of scarcity of which you started with in reducing sign on and refer bonus

Lastly, I would like to congratulate and appreciate the team for great step they made to make real mobile mining happen in real life situation, the existing issues arising I count them as normal due to the tech is still young and need more development and design yo make it less no no bug. Thanks
10
Steven - after switch to IPFS, we will not resync, since IPFS is consider local file even it is spread among network. All content is hash based into local node so will not resync once it is in local, which could be considered solved once for all only in ipfs. The font will be changed.
The new chain can choose to airdropping coins to existing TAU holders, since all holders address is there and in consensus. The value for TAU will be the security and registration of new community born. This will not require very high speed. The real message and transactions will happen on branch chains. Therefore the overall speed is high in the tree system.
Bear - it is very hard for me to comment on taut. TAU is targetting umlimited ecosystem scale thanks to the tree blockchain and mobile ipfs nodes to participate. There are lots of changes from fork off from taut, in terms of tau technology vision and progress.
Jhun - The proof of transaction is an offspring from NXT proof of stake, mathematically, we are very similar with different weight calculation. NXT is on coin volume, TAU is on transaction numbers. What you mean fresh coins is called “block reward”, we do not use that because of BTC/ETH type of blockchain reward only possible in POW system. In POT system, you have to mint all coins in the beginning. Therefore, we have a burden to distribute that. We are lucky to inherit this. Please think about, in a forum, if high power machine can generate more coins, then someone with high machines can spam all forums and branch community/coins. In pot system, no matter how much power you have, if admin does not issue you coins, you can not really do anything about the blockchain growing. It is very naturally fitting blockchain reddit type of community driven application.
Specter - thanks, i admit we have lots of issue in this to fight the unstable system of cell phone. As a key action, we migrate from java to golang to make it more stable. Thanks for the patience, we are working on that each day. We are more realizing this is an operating system level development. Thanks for keep up alert on bugs. This is what we owe to our community.
Muxa - we will have a browser version of tau browser, if someone love download content of a specific branch chain, it will be faster reading user experineces. LBRY is created before IPFS is well known. With IPFS, it is all natively integrated in terms of content delivery either p2p or through ipfs relay. Certainly, TAU will provide a big relay for all content to start with. I am expecting future commercial relay will be there for subscription if content is really growing strong on tau.
Cable - we recognize the problem of this version. We will fix once dev is back from holidays. The main vision for TAU now is the blockchain reddit to protect freedom of speech and coins for community value.
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10